ADATA Technology vs Innodisk

Both are primarily Memory Modules & Storage companies. Innodisk is larger by market cap ($3.9B vs $3.6B). ADATA Technology reports higher tracked revenue ($1.7B vs $449M).

See all 32 Memory companies →

Track the chain

What moved in the semiconductor supply chain — This Week in the Chain, the free weekly wafergraph briefing.

Subscribe to the free weekly briefing →

Free · no login · 615 companies, updated weekly

Side-by-side

ADATA TechnologyInnodisk
Market cap$3.6B$3.9B
Revenue$1.7B (FY2025)$449M (FY2025)
Primary segmentMemory Modules & StorageMemory Modules & Storage
Market positionmajorniche
CountryTaiwanTaiwan
Tracked suppliers30
Tracked customers44
Chokepoint / criticality68/10050/100

Market caps/revenue from the wafergraph dataset · data as of 2026-10-09. Criticality is a graph-derived chokepoint score (0–100). Coverage is partial; "Unpriced" means no reliable market cap.

How ADATA Technology and Innodisk compare

  • Size: Innodisk is the larger company by market cap.
  • Revenue: ADATA Technology reports higher tracked revenue.
  • Supply-chain criticality: ADATA Technology has the higher chokepoint score (68/100 vs 50/100).
  • Footprint: ADATA Technology (Taiwan) vs Innodisk (Taiwan).

Company hubs

ADATA Technology · Innodisk · Memory segment

Open the interactive comparison tool →

Cite as: wafergraph, “ADATA Technology vs Innodisk”, https://wafergraph.com/compare/adata-vs-innodisk (data as of 2026-10-09).

Frequently asked questions3
Is ADATA Technology bigger than Innodisk?
Innodisk is larger by market cap ($3.9B vs $3.6B).
What's the difference between ADATA Technology and Innodisk?
ADATA Technology is a major in Memory Modules & Storage based in Taiwan; Innodisk is a niche in Memory Modules & Storage based in Taiwan. Both operate in the Memory segment.
Who are ADATA Technology's and Innodisk's suppliers?
wafergraph tracks 3 suppliers for ADATA Technology and 0 for Innodisk — ADATA Technology's include Kioxia Holdings, Phison Electronics, Silicon Motion.