Ajinomoto vs AT&S

Both are primarily Substrates companies. Ajinomoto is larger by market cap ($32.5B vs $9.3B). Ajinomoto reports higher tracked revenue ($10.0B vs $2.0B).

See all 105 Materials companies →

Track the chain

What moved in the semiconductor supply chain — This Week in the Chain, the free weekly wafergraph briefing.

Subscribe to the free weekly briefing →

Free · no login · 615 companies, updated weekly

Side-by-side

AjinomotoAT&S
Market cap$32.5B$9.3B
Revenue$10.0B (FY2026)$2.0B (FY2026)
Primary segmentSubstratesSubstrates
Market positionmonopolymajor
CountryJapanAustria
Tracked suppliers00
Tracked customers138
Chokepoint / criticality99/10068/100

Market caps/revenue from the wafergraph dataset · data as of 2026-10-09. Criticality is a graph-derived chokepoint score (0–100). Coverage is partial; "Unpriced" means no reliable market cap.

How Ajinomoto and AT&S compare

  • Size: Ajinomoto is the larger company by market cap.
  • Revenue: Ajinomoto reports higher tracked revenue.
  • Supply-chain criticality: Ajinomoto has the higher chokepoint score (99/100 vs 68/100).
  • Footprint: Ajinomoto (Japan) vs AT&S (Austria).

Company hubs

Ajinomoto · AT&S · Materials segment

Open the interactive comparison tool →

Cite as: wafergraph, “Ajinomoto vs AT&S”, https://wafergraph.com/compare/ajinomoto-vs-ats (data as of 2026-10-09).

Frequently asked questions3
Is Ajinomoto bigger than AT&S?
Ajinomoto is larger by market cap ($32.5B vs $9.3B).
What's the difference between Ajinomoto and AT&S?
Ajinomoto is a monopoly in Substrates based in Japan; AT&S is a major in Substrates based in Austria. Both operate in the Materials segment.
Who are Ajinomoto's and AT&S's suppliers?
wafergraph tracks 0 suppliers for Ajinomoto and 0 for AT&S.