Arteris vs Faraday Technology
Both are primarily Semiconductor IP Licensing companies. Faraday Technology is larger by market cap ($1.4B vs $1.0B). Faraday Technology reports higher tracked revenue ($565M vs $71M).
Shared segment: EDA & IP.
Side-by-side
| Arteris | Faraday Technology | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $1.0B | $1.4B |
| Revenue | $71M (FY2025) | $565M (FY2025) |
| Primary segment | Semiconductor IP Licensing | Semiconductor IP Licensing |
| Market position | niche | major |
| Country | United States | Taiwan |
| Tracked suppliers | 0 | 3 |
| Tracked customers | 8 | 10 |
| Chokepoint / criticality | 50/100 | 68/100 |
Market caps/revenue from the wafergraph dataset · data as of 2026-09-16. Criticality is a graph-derived chokepoint score (0–100). Coverage is partial; "Unpriced" means no reliable market cap.
How Arteris and Faraday Technology compare
- Size: Faraday Technology is the larger company by market cap.
- Revenue: Faraday Technology reports higher tracked revenue.
- Supply-chain criticality: Faraday Technology has the higher chokepoint score (68/100 vs 50/100).
- Footprint: Arteris (United States) vs Faraday Technology (Taiwan).
Company hubs
Open the interactive comparison tool →
Cite as: wafergraph, “Arteris vs Faraday Technology”, https://wafergraph.com/compare/arteris-vs-faraday (data as of 2026-09-16).