AT&S vs Kyocera
Both are primarily Substrates companies. Kyocera is larger by market cap ($29.4B vs $7.0B). Kyocera reports higher tracked revenue ($13.3B vs $2.1B).
Shared segment: Materials.
Side-by-side
| AT&S | Kyocera | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $7.0B | $29.4B |
| Revenue | $2.1B (FY2026) | $13.3B (FY2026) |
| Primary segment | Substrates | Substrates |
| Market position | major | major |
| Country | Austria | Japan |
| Tracked suppliers | 0 | 0 |
| Tracked customers | 8 | 10 |
| Chokepoint / criticality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
Market caps/revenue from the wafergraph dataset · data as of 2026-09-16. Criticality is a graph-derived chokepoint score (0–100). Coverage is partial; "Unpriced" means no reliable market cap.
How AT&S and Kyocera compare
- Size: Kyocera is the larger company by market cap.
- Revenue: Kyocera reports higher tracked revenue.
- Supply-chain criticality: Both companies have the same chokepoint score (68/100).
- Footprint: AT&S (Austria) vs Kyocera (Japan).
Company hubs
Open the interactive comparison tool →
Cite as: wafergraph, “AT&S vs Kyocera”, https://wafergraph.com/compare/ats-vs-kyocera (data as of 2026-09-16).