AT&S vs Nan Ya PCB
Both are primarily Substrates companies. Nan Ya PCB is larger by market cap ($22.6B vs $7.0B). AT&S reports higher tracked revenue ($2.1B vs $1.3B).
Shared segment: Materials.
Side-by-side
| AT&S | Nan Ya PCB | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $7.0B | $22.6B |
| Revenue | $2.1B (FY2026) | $1.3B (FY2025) |
| Primary segment | Substrates | Substrates |
| Market position | major | major |
| Country | Austria | Taiwan |
| Tracked suppliers | 0 | 1 |
| Tracked customers | 8 | 9 |
| Chokepoint / criticality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
Market caps/revenue from the wafergraph dataset · data as of 2026-09-16. Criticality is a graph-derived chokepoint score (0–100). Coverage is partial; "Unpriced" means no reliable market cap.
How AT&S and Nan Ya PCB compare
- Size: Nan Ya PCB is the larger company by market cap.
- Revenue: AT&S reports higher tracked revenue.
- Supply-chain criticality: Both companies have the same chokepoint score (68/100).
- Footprint: AT&S (Austria) vs Nan Ya PCB (Taiwan).
Company hubs
Open the interactive comparison tool →
Cite as: wafergraph, “AT&S vs Nan Ya PCB”, https://wafergraph.com/compare/ats-vs-nanya_pcb (data as of 2026-09-16).