Chang Wah Technology vs Kyocera
Chang Wah Technology's primary segment is Packaging Materials (Leadframes, Bonding Wire); Kyocera's is Substrates. Kyocera is larger by market cap ($30.0B vs $2.2B).
Track the chain
What moved in the semiconductor supply chain — This Week in the Chain, the free weekly wafergraph briefing.
Subscribe to the free weekly briefing →
Free · no login · 615 companies, updated weekly
Side-by-side
| Chang Wah Technology | Kyocera | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $2.2B | $30.0B |
| Revenue | — | $13.1B (FY2026) |
| Primary segment | Packaging Materials (Leadframes, Bonding Wire) | Substrates |
| Market position | major | major |
| Country | Taiwan | Japan |
| Tracked suppliers | 0 | 0 |
| Tracked customers | 13 | 10 |
| Chokepoint / criticality | 69/100 | 68/100 |
Market caps/revenue from the wafergraph dataset · data as of 2026-10-09. Criticality is a graph-derived chokepoint score (0–100). Coverage is partial; "Unpriced" means no reliable market cap.
How Chang Wah Technology and Kyocera compare
- Size: Kyocera is the larger company by market cap.
- Supply-chain criticality: Chang Wah Technology has the higher chokepoint score (69/100 vs 68/100).
- Footprint: Chang Wah Technology (Taiwan) vs Kyocera (Japan).
Company hubs
Open the interactive comparison tool →
Cite as: wafergraph, “Chang Wah Technology vs Kyocera”, https://wafergraph.com/compare/chang_wah-vs-kyocera (data as of 2026-10-09).
Frequently asked questions3
- Is Chang Wah Technology bigger than Kyocera?
- Kyocera is larger by market cap ($30.0B vs $2.2B).
- What's the difference between Chang Wah Technology and Kyocera?
- Chang Wah Technology is a major in Packaging Materials (Leadframes, Bonding Wire) based in Taiwan; Kyocera is a major in Substrates based in Japan. Both operate in the Materials segment.
- Who are Chang Wah Technology's and Kyocera's suppliers?
- wafergraph tracks 0 suppliers for Chang Wah Technology and 0 for Kyocera.