Chroma ATE vs inTEST

Both are primarily Test Equipment companies. Chroma ATE is larger by market cap ($30.9B vs $180M). Chroma ATE reports higher tracked revenue ($890M vs $67M).

See all 25 Equipment (Back End) companies →

Track the chain

What moved in the semiconductor supply chain — This Week in the Chain, the free weekly wafergraph briefing.

Subscribe to the free weekly briefing →

Free · no login · 615 companies, updated weekly

Side-by-side

Chroma ATEinTEST
Market cap$30.9B$180M
Revenue$890M (FY2025)$67M (FY2017)
Primary segmentTest EquipmentTest Equipment
Market positionmajorniche
CountryTaiwanUnited States
Tracked suppliers60
Tracked customers97
Chokepoint / criticality68/10050/100

Market caps/revenue from the wafergraph dataset · data as of 2026-10-09. Criticality is a graph-derived chokepoint score (0–100). Coverage is partial; "Unpriced" means no reliable market cap.

How Chroma ATE and inTEST compare

  • Size: Chroma ATE is the larger company by market cap.
  • Revenue: Chroma ATE reports higher tracked revenue.
  • Supply-chain criticality: Chroma ATE has the higher chokepoint score (68/100 vs 50/100).
  • Footprint: Chroma ATE (Taiwan) vs inTEST (United States).

Company hubs

Chroma ATE · inTEST · Equipment (Back End) segment

Open the interactive comparison tool →

Cite as: wafergraph, “Chroma ATE vs inTEST”, https://wafergraph.com/compare/chroma-vs-intest (data as of 2026-10-09).

Frequently asked questions3
Is Chroma ATE bigger than inTEST?
Chroma ATE is larger by market cap ($30.9B vs $180M).
What's the difference between Chroma ATE and inTEST?
Chroma ATE is a major in Test Equipment based in Taiwan; inTEST is a niche in Test Equipment based in United States. Both operate in the Equipment (Back End) segment.
Who are Chroma ATE's and inTEST's suppliers?
wafergraph tracks 6 suppliers for Chroma ATE and 0 for inTEST — Chroma ATE's include Macnica Holdings, Weikeng Industrial, WT Microelectronics.