Ferrotec vs Horiba
Ferrotec's primary segment is Sputtering Targets; Horiba's is Subsystems & Components. Horiba is larger by market cap ($5.9B vs $3.1B). Horiba reports higher tracked revenue ($2.1B vs $1.9B).
Shared segment: Equipment (Front End).
Side-by-side
| Ferrotec | Horiba | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $3.1B | $5.9B |
| Revenue | $1.9B (FY2026) | $2.1B (FY2025) |
| Primary segment | Sputtering Targets | Subsystems & Components |
| Market position | niche | major |
| Country | Japan | Japan |
| Tracked suppliers | 2 | 0 |
| Tracked customers | 13 | 13 |
| Chokepoint / criticality | 53/100 | 71/100 |
Market caps/revenue from the wafergraph dataset · data as of 2026-09-16. Criticality is a graph-derived chokepoint score (0–100). Coverage is partial; "Unpriced" means no reliable market cap.
How Ferrotec and Horiba compare
- Size: Horiba is the larger company by market cap.
- Revenue: Horiba reports higher tracked revenue.
- Supply-chain criticality: Horiba has the higher chokepoint score (71/100 vs 53/100).
- Footprint: Ferrotec (Japan) vs Horiba (Japan).
Company hubs
Open the interactive comparison tool →
Cite as: wafergraph, “Ferrotec vs Horiba”, https://wafergraph.com/compare/ferrotec-vs-horiba (data as of 2026-09-16).