Ferrotec vs Mitsubishi Materials
Mitsubishi Materials is larger by market cap ($4.3B vs $3.0B). Mitsubishi Materials reports higher tracked revenue ($11.6B vs $1.8B). Both are primarily Sputtering Targets companies.
Shared segment: Materials.
Side-by-side
| Ferrotec | Mitsubishi Materials | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $3.0B | $4.3B |
| Revenue | $1.8B (FY2026) | $11.6B (FY2026) |
| Primary segment | Sputtering Targets | Sputtering Targets |
| Market position | niche | major |
| Country | Japan | Japan |
| Tracked suppliers | 2 | 0 |
| Tracked customers | 13 | 7 |
| Chokepoint / criticality | 53/100 | 68/100 |
Market caps/revenue from the wafergraph dataset · data as of 2026-08-12. Criticality is a graph-derived chokepoint score (0–100). Coverage is partial; "Unpriced" means no reliable market cap.
How Ferrotec and Mitsubishi Materials compare
- Size: Mitsubishi Materials is the larger company by market cap.
- Revenue: Mitsubishi Materials reports higher tracked revenue.
- Supply-chain criticality: Mitsubishi Materials has the higher chokepoint score (68/100 vs 53/100).
- Footprint: Ferrotec (Japan) vs Mitsubishi Materials (Japan).