Ferrotec vs Ultra Clean Holdings
Ferrotec's primary segment is Sputtering Targets; Ultra Clean Holdings's is Subsystems & Components. Ferrotec is larger by market cap ($3.1B vs $3.0B). Ultra Clean Holdings reports higher tracked revenue ($2.1B vs $1.9B).
Shared segment: Equipment (Front End).
Side-by-side
| Ferrotec | Ultra Clean Holdings | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $3.1B | $3.0B |
| Revenue | $1.9B (FY2026) | $2.1B (FY2024) |
| Primary segment | Sputtering Targets | Subsystems & Components |
| Market position | niche | niche |
| Country | Japan | United States |
| Tracked suppliers | 2 | 0 |
| Tracked customers | 13 | 10 |
| Chokepoint / criticality | 53/100 | 52/100 |
Market caps/revenue from the wafergraph dataset · data as of 2026-09-16. Criticality is a graph-derived chokepoint score (0–100). Coverage is partial; "Unpriced" means no reliable market cap.
How Ferrotec and Ultra Clean Holdings compare
- Size: Ferrotec is the larger company by market cap.
- Revenue: Ultra Clean Holdings reports higher tracked revenue.
- Supply-chain criticality: Ferrotec has the higher chokepoint score (53/100 vs 52/100).
- Footprint: Ferrotec (Japan) vs Ultra Clean Holdings (United States).
Company hubs
Ferrotec · Ultra Clean Holdings · Equipment (Front End) segment
Open the interactive comparison tool →
Cite as: wafergraph, “Ferrotec vs Ultra Clean Holdings”, https://wafergraph.com/compare/ferrotec-vs-ultra_clean (data as of 2026-09-16).