Ferrotec vs VAT Group

Ferrotec's primary segment is Sputtering Targets; VAT Group's is Subsystems & Components. VAT Group is larger by market cap ($24.4B vs $3.9B). Ferrotec reports higher tracked revenue ($1.8B vs $1.3B).

See all 64 Equipment (Front End) companies →

Track the chain

What moved in the semiconductor supply chain — This Week in the Chain, the free weekly wafergraph briefing.

Subscribe to the free weekly briefing →

Free · no login · 615 companies, updated weekly

Side-by-side

FerrotecVAT Group
Market cap$3.9B$24.4B
Revenue$1.8B (FY2026)$1.3B (FY2025)
Primary segmentSputtering TargetsSubsystems & Components
Market positionnicheleader
CountryJapanSwitzerland
Tracked suppliers20
Tracked customers1313
Chokepoint / criticality53/10085/100

Market caps/revenue from the wafergraph dataset · data as of 2026-10-09. Criticality is a graph-derived chokepoint score (0–100). Coverage is partial; "Unpriced" means no reliable market cap.

How Ferrotec and VAT Group compare

  • Size: VAT Group is the larger company by market cap.
  • Revenue: Ferrotec reports higher tracked revenue.
  • Supply-chain criticality: VAT Group has the higher chokepoint score (85/100 vs 53/100).
  • Footprint: Ferrotec (Japan) vs VAT Group (Switzerland).

Company hubs

Ferrotec · VAT Group · Equipment (Front End) segment

Open the interactive comparison tool →

Cite as: wafergraph, “Ferrotec vs VAT Group”, https://wafergraph.com/compare/ferrotec-vs-vat_group (data as of 2026-10-09).

Frequently asked questions3
Is Ferrotec bigger than VAT Group?
VAT Group is larger by market cap ($24.4B vs $3.9B).
What's the difference between Ferrotec and VAT Group?
Ferrotec is a niche in Sputtering Targets based in Japan; VAT Group is a leader in Subsystems & Components based in Switzerland. Both operate in the Equipment (Front End) segment.
Who are Ferrotec's and VAT Group's suppliers?
wafergraph tracks 2 suppliers for Ferrotec and 0 for VAT Group — Ferrotec's include Heraeus, Tosoh.