Ferrotec vs Wonik QnC
Ferrotec's primary segment is Sputtering Targets; Wonik QnC's is Subsystems & Components. Ferrotec is larger by market cap ($3.1B vs $520M). Ferrotec reports higher tracked revenue ($1.9B vs $684M).
Shared segment: Equipment (Front End).
Side-by-side
| Ferrotec | Wonik QnC | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $3.1B | $520M |
| Revenue | $1.9B (FY2026) | $684M (FY2025) |
| Primary segment | Sputtering Targets | Subsystems & Components |
| Market position | niche | niche |
| Country | Japan | South Korea |
| Tracked suppliers | 2 | 0 |
| Tracked customers | 13 | 7 |
| Chokepoint / criticality | 53/100 | 50/100 |
Market caps/revenue from the wafergraph dataset · data as of 2026-09-16. Criticality is a graph-derived chokepoint score (0–100). Coverage is partial; "Unpriced" means no reliable market cap.
How Ferrotec and Wonik QnC compare
- Size: Ferrotec is the larger company by market cap.
- Revenue: Ferrotec reports higher tracked revenue.
- Supply-chain criticality: Ferrotec has the higher chokepoint score (53/100 vs 50/100).
- Footprint: Ferrotec (Japan) vs Wonik QnC (South Korea).
Company hubs
Open the interactive comparison tool →
Cite as: wafergraph, “Ferrotec vs Wonik QnC”, https://wafergraph.com/compare/ferrotec-vs-wonik_qnc (data as of 2026-09-16).