Kingboard Holdings vs Samsung Electro-Mechanics
Both are primarily Substrates companies. Samsung Electro-Mechanics is larger by market cap ($74.6B vs $8.1B). Samsung Electro-Mechanics reports higher tracked revenue ($8.2B vs $5.8B).
Shared segment: Materials.
Side-by-side
| Kingboard Holdings | Samsung Electro-Mechanics | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $8.1B | $74.6B |
| Revenue | $5.8B (FY2025) | $8.2B (FY2025) |
| Primary segment | Substrates | Substrates |
| Market position | major | major |
| Country | Hong Kong | South Korea |
| Tracked suppliers | 0 | 1 |
| Tracked customers | 7 | 9 |
| Chokepoint / criticality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
Market caps/revenue from the wafergraph dataset · data as of 2026-09-16. Criticality is a graph-derived chokepoint score (0–100). Coverage is partial; "Unpriced" means no reliable market cap.
How Kingboard Holdings and Samsung Electro-Mechanics compare
- Size: Samsung Electro-Mechanics is the larger company by market cap.
- Revenue: Samsung Electro-Mechanics reports higher tracked revenue.
- Supply-chain criticality: Both companies have the same chokepoint score (68/100).
- Footprint: Kingboard Holdings (Hong Kong) vs Samsung Electro-Mechanics (South Korea).
Company hubs
Kingboard Holdings · Samsung Electro-Mechanics · Materials segment
Open the interactive comparison tool →
Cite as: wafergraph, “Kingboard Holdings vs Samsung Electro-Mechanics”, https://wafergraph.com/compare/kingboard-vs-semco (data as of 2026-09-16).