Kioxia Holdings vs SK hynix
SK hynix reports higher tracked revenue ($68.5B vs $627M). Kioxia Holdings's primary segment is NAND; SK hynix's is DRAM.
Shared segment: Memory.
Side-by-side
| Kioxia Holdings | SK hynix | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | Unpriced | Unpriced |
| Revenue | $627M (FY2026) | $68.5B (FY2025) |
| Primary segment | NAND | DRAM |
| Market position | major | leader |
| Country | Japan | South Korea |
| Tracked suppliers | 4 | 170 |
| Tracked customers | 8 | 14 |
| Chokepoint / criticality | 68/100 | 81/100 |
Market caps/revenue from the wafergraph dataset · data as of 2026-08-12. Criticality is a graph-derived chokepoint score (0–100). Coverage is partial; "Unpriced" means no reliable market cap.
How Kioxia Holdings and SK hynix compare
- Revenue: SK hynix reports higher tracked revenue.
- Supply-chain criticality: SK hynix has the higher chokepoint score (81/100 vs 68/100).
- Footprint: Kioxia Holdings (Japan) vs SK hynix (South Korea).