Kyocera vs Samsung Electro-Mechanics
Both are primarily Substrates companies. Samsung Electro-Mechanics is larger by market cap ($74.6B vs $29.4B). Kyocera reports higher tracked revenue ($13.3B vs $8.2B).
Shared segment: Materials.
Side-by-side
| Kyocera | Samsung Electro-Mechanics | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $29.4B | $74.6B |
| Revenue | $13.3B (FY2026) | $8.2B (FY2025) |
| Primary segment | Substrates | Substrates |
| Market position | major | major |
| Country | Japan | South Korea |
| Tracked suppliers | 0 | 1 |
| Tracked customers | 10 | 9 |
| Chokepoint / criticality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
Market caps/revenue from the wafergraph dataset · data as of 2026-09-16. Criticality is a graph-derived chokepoint score (0–100). Coverage is partial; "Unpriced" means no reliable market cap.
How Kyocera and Samsung Electro-Mechanics compare
- Size: Samsung Electro-Mechanics is the larger company by market cap.
- Revenue: Kyocera reports higher tracked revenue.
- Supply-chain criticality: Both companies have the same chokepoint score (68/100).
- Footprint: Kyocera (Japan) vs Samsung Electro-Mechanics (South Korea).
Company hubs
Open the interactive comparison tool →
Cite as: wafergraph, “Kyocera vs Samsung Electro-Mechanics”, https://wafergraph.com/compare/kyocera-vs-semco (data as of 2026-09-16).