M31 Technology vs QuickLogic
M31 Technology's primary segment is Semiconductor IP Licensing; QuickLogic's is FPGA. M31 Technology is larger by market cap ($570M vs $180M). M31 Technology reports higher tracked revenue ($56M vs $14M).
Shared segment: EDA & IP.
Side-by-side
| M31 Technology | QuickLogic | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $570M | $180M |
| Revenue | $56M (FY2025) | $14M (FY2025) |
| Primary segment | Semiconductor IP Licensing | FPGA |
| Market position | niche | niche |
| Country | Taiwan | United States |
| Tracked suppliers | 0 | 3 |
| Tracked customers | 8 | 8 |
| Chokepoint / criticality | 50/100 | 50/100 |
Market caps/revenue from the wafergraph dataset · data as of 2026-09-16. Criticality is a graph-derived chokepoint score (0–100). Coverage is partial; "Unpriced" means no reliable market cap.
How M31 Technology and QuickLogic compare
- Size: M31 Technology is the larger company by market cap.
- Revenue: M31 Technology reports higher tracked revenue.
- Supply-chain criticality: Both companies have the same chokepoint score (50/100).
- Footprint: M31 Technology (Taiwan) vs QuickLogic (United States).
Company hubs
Open the interactive comparison tool →
Cite as: wafergraph, “M31 Technology vs QuickLogic”, https://wafergraph.com/compare/m31-vs-quicklogic (data as of 2026-09-16).