Chipbond Technology vs Orient Semiconductor (OSE)
Both are primarily Outsourced Assembly & Test companies. Chipbond Technology is larger by market cap ($5.1B vs $890M). Chipbond Technology reports higher tracked revenue ($673M vs $524M).
Shared segment: OSAT.
Side-by-side
| Chipbond Technology | Orient Semiconductor (OSE) | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $5.1B | $890M |
| Revenue | $673M (FY2025) | $524M (FY2023) |
| Primary segment | Outsourced Assembly & Test | Outsourced Assembly & Test |
| Market position | major | niche |
| Country | Taiwan | Taiwan |
| Tracked suppliers | 0 | 0 |
| Tracked customers | 9 | 6 |
| Chokepoint / criticality | 68/100 | 50/100 |
Market caps/revenue from the wafergraph dataset · data as of 2026-09-16. Criticality is a graph-derived chokepoint score (0–100). Coverage is partial; "Unpriced" means no reliable market cap.
How Chipbond Technology and Orient Semiconductor (OSE) compare
- Size: Chipbond Technology is the larger company by market cap.
- Revenue: Chipbond Technology reports higher tracked revenue.
- Supply-chain criticality: Chipbond Technology has the higher chokepoint score (68/100 vs 50/100).
- Footprint: Chipbond Technology (Taiwan) vs Orient Semiconductor (OSE) (Taiwan).
Company hubs
Chipbond Technology · Orient Semiconductor (OSE) · OSAT segment
Open the interactive comparison tool →
Cite as: wafergraph, “Chipbond Technology vs Orient Semiconductor (OSE)”, https://wafergraph.com/compare/chipbond-vs-ose (data as of 2026-09-16).